If you're in a gnarly disagreement and you feel like the conversation keeps going in circles, here's one way out: tease apart the questions that get raised in the disagreement into FACTS, VALUES, and PROPOSALS.
Interesting approach Buster! The document in the link appears to be blank. From my side it would be great to explore this idea further by understanding where your different approaches led within the context of an actual disagreement. I think an Australian topic that has a bit of global resonance and is thorny and complex is the banning of climbing Ayers Rock. https://www.google.com.au/amp/amp.abc.net.au/article/9103512
Can you try the link again? I tried it in an incognito window and it loaded for me, but I'm wondering if others are having this same problem. I'd love to do this: "explore this idea further by understanding where your different approaches led within the context of an actual disagreement". This exercise was very much related to what I call "building arguments together" and "cultivating a neutral space". But happy to go into it in more detail if it's helpful.
Interesting approach Buster! The document in the link appears to be blank. From my side it would be great to explore this idea further by understanding where your different approaches led within the context of an actual disagreement. I think an Australian topic that has a bit of global resonance and is thorny and complex is the banning of climbing Ayers Rock. https://www.google.com.au/amp/amp.abc.net.au/article/9103512
Can you try the link again? I tried it in an incognito window and it loaded for me, but I'm wondering if others are having this same problem. I'd love to do this: "explore this idea further by understanding where your different approaches led within the context of an actual disagreement". This exercise was very much related to what I call "building arguments together" and "cultivating a neutral space". But happy to go into it in more detail if it's helpful.